When a phenomena exist is too easy to generate a position. The radical thinking is actually a mainstream. The popullations have been diversified by factors as money, race, gender, limits and social approachs. In occidentals countries as I lived, the people used to live in general discontent about government and social problems as inequity, discrimination and strike for status. Recently, the mexican country has been in focus due to problems with educations system. The problem is complex combination of social problems with connotations of manipulation and personal interests, the main is the loss of work benefits.
The consequences of this, were the death of 20 social activists during a manifestation. When the action occurs, the mexican popullation began to manifest in social media condemning the acts of the government. Unfortunatelly, the actual administration has been identify from their radical acts and a general discontent. In the evolution of societies, the humanity began to work in a collaborate scenario, discuss our differences and dissapointments. Trying to work with diplomacy and respect. In Mexico, this is difficult because historically we have been a bad communication always. Also the add of complexity of organization systems have been constructing an inequity management custom as labor union, we have an uneasy way to solve the problem. Another problem is the disturbing and misinformation effects that the social actors generate with good intentions. In other side, the social activists commits their live by their cause. They are helpless against opponents as government.
-Acquaintance postions are know for us like a souvenir-
